Nuno insisted he “nonetheless believes” all three selections ought to have resulted in spot-kicks.
He added: “The PGMOL clearly stated the third one was a penalty however sadly they [the officials on the day] acquired it fallacious. It’s occurred earlier than when the panel has determined and stated it was the opposite method spherical. We can’t be bothered by that.
“I all the time attempt to be respectful, I attempt to perceive how laborious the work of the referee is however this 12 months it’s troublesome. There are too many conditions occurring. I felt it was unattainable to regulate the feelings and that’s why I’ve change into so vocal.”
Nuno is now hoping to keep away from a ban after submitting his response to the FA.
He stated: “I learn it, I agreed and I signed it. We’re nonetheless ready. Hopefully I don’t get punished and I could be on the touchline.”
Forest are anticipated to be charged by the FA and the Premier League for his or her outburst after the loss.
This week it was revealed the Key Match Incident Panel unanimously agreed Forest ought to have been given a penalty when Younger introduced down Hudson-Odoi within the fifty fifth minute of their match at Goodison Park on 21 April.
The membership referred to as for the audio between video assistant referee Attwell and on-field official Anthony Taylor to be launched publicly, with the PGMOL giving them the prospect to take heed to it privately.
Talking on the Sky Sports activities’ Mic’d Up programme on Tuesday, Webb stated he would have welcomed a VAR intervention over the Young tackle.